Marcus Rashford : OSP
Marcus Rashford : OSP
Imagine a brand is deciding whether to pay Marcus Rashford to promote its products. Build the case.
1 - He has various charitable causes that he has been apart of that would make the brand look good
2 - He plays for Manchester United and England so he would elevate the brand's legitimacy
3 - He has a large football fanbase so his fans would buy from the brand therefore creating revenue for the brand
HOW would social media be used to make the association?
- He could post a photo or a video wearing or using the brand.
ONE risk to the brand if it goes wrong?
- It could damage their reputation if he doesn't act act accordingly with the brand persona.
Decide: would you advise the brand to go ahead?
- Yes because he is one of the most famous footballers in the world so having him endorse a brand would elevate is fame .
Why does Nike benefit from associating with him?
- His social activism and reach to the younger generation will benefit Nike greatly.
Representation:
Selection: what is shown? What is left out?
- You can see the image directly focused in on Marcus Rashford after scoring a goal and his fans in the stadium behind him
Construction: which media-language choices build the representation?
- It builds the idea that he has a very loyal fanbase
Stereotype check: positive, negative, or challenging a stereotype?
- It creates a positive stereotype that he is a frequent winner
One way he is represented positively and one stereotype he challenges.
-
Evaluate: 'Rashford's online presence challenges negative stereotypes.' How far do you agree?
- I agree beacuse

Comments
Post a Comment